11
Braz Dent Sci 2024 Jan/Mar; 27 (1): e3904
Ibrahim GI et al.
Antimicrobial activity of Er , Cr: YSGG and Ultrasonic on E. faecalis biofilm in the mesial root canal systems of lower molars
Ibrahim GI et al. Antimicrobial activity of Er, Cr: YSGG and Ultrasonic on E. faecalis
biofilm in the mesial root canal systems of lower molars
11. Kumar BR, Rao TS. AFM studies on surface morphology,
topography and texture of nanostructured zinc aluminum oxide
thin films. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 2012;7(4):1881-9.
12. Gadegaard N. Atomic force microscopy in biology: technology
and techniques. Biotech Histochem. 2006;81(2–3):87-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10520290600783143. PMid:16908433.
13. Farina M, Schemmel A, Weissmüller G, Cruz R, Kachar B, Bisch PM.
Atomic force microscopy study of tooth surfaces. J Struct Biol.
1999;125(1):39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1998.4069.
PMid:10196115.
14. Farshad M, Abbaszadegan A, Ghahramani Y, Jamshidzadeh A.
Effect of imidazolium-based silver nanoparticles on root dentin
roughness in comparison with three common root canal irrigants.
Iran Endod J. 2017;12(1):83-6. PMid:28179931.
15. Abdelgawad LM, Asmail N, Latif SA, Safaan AM. Efficacy of
diode laser and sonic agitation of Chlorhexidine and Silver-
nanoparticles in infected root canals. Braz Dent Sci. 2020;23(3):7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i3.1989.
16. Jiang AP, Ipe DS, Love RM, George R. Evaluation of bacterial kill in
human roots infected with
Enterococcus faecalis
biofilm following
980 nm laser activation of chlorhexidine. Transl Biophotonics.
2020;2(4):e202000008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tbio.202000008.
17. Hubble TS, Hatton JF, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE, Gillespie MJ.
Influence of
Enterococcus faecalis
proteases and the collagen‐
binding protein, Ace, on adhesion to dentin. Oral Microbiol
Immunol. 2003;18(2):121-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-
302X.2003.00059.x. PMid:12654103.
18. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlén G, Kvist T. Microbiological status
of root‐filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J.
1998;31(1):1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-
1-00111.x. PMid:9823122.
19. Hope CK, Garton SG, Wang Q, Burnside G, Farrelly PJ. A direct
comparison between extracted tooth and filter-membrane
biofilm models of endodontic irrigation using
Enterococcus
faecalis.
Arch Microbiol. 2010;192(9):775-81. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1007/s00203-010-0604-6. PMid:20652229.
20. Eldeniz AU, Ozer F, Hadimli HH, Erganis O. Bactericidal efficacy
of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation against
Enterococcus faecalis
compared with NaOCl irrigation: an
ex vivo
pilot study. Int
Endod J. 2007;40(2):112-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
2591.2006.01190.x. PMid:17229116.
21. Spratt DA, Pratten J, Wilson M, Gulabivala K. An
in vitro
evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms
of root canal isolates. Int Endod J. 2001;34(4):300-7. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00392.x. PMid:11482142.
22. Cheng X, Tian T, Tian Y, Xiang D, Qiu J, Liu X,etal. Erbium: yttrium
aluminum garnet laser-activated sodium hypochlorite irrigation:
a promising procedure for minimally invasive endodontics.
Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35(12):695-701. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1089/pho.2017.4274. PMid:28922064.
23. Mehrvarzfar P, Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Fekrazad R, Karamifar
K, Eslami G, etal. Additive effect of a diode laser on the
antibacterial activity of 2.5% NaOCl, 2% CHX and MTAD against
Enterococcus faecalis
contaminating root canals: an
in
vitro
study. J Oral Sci. 2011;53(3):355-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/
josnusd.53.355. PMid:21959664.
24. Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of
chlorhexidine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;112(6):863-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0118. PMid:2940282.
25. Ercan E, Özekinci T, Atakul F, Gül K. Antibacterial activity of
2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite
in infected root canal:
in vivo
study. J Endod. 2004;30(2):84-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00005.
PMid:14977302.
26. George R. Evaluation of the evidence of effectiveness of
ultrasonic activated irrigation for root canal treatment. Evid
Based Dent. 2019;20(3):83-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41432-
019-0037-2. PMid:31562409.
27. Hoedke D, Kaulika N, Dommisch H, Schlafer S, Shemesh H, Bitter
K. Reduction of dual‐species biofilm after sonic‐or ultrasonic‐
activated irrigation protocols: a laboratory study. Int Endod
J. 2021;54(12):2219-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13618.
PMid:34418114.
28. Kumar K, Teoh Y, Walsh LJ. Root canal cleaning in roots
with complex canals using agitated irrigation fluids. Aust
Endod J. 2023;49(1):56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aej.12646.
PMid:35770921.
29. Muhammed FS, Jawad HA. Pulsed Er,Cr:YSGG laser for
surface modification of dental zerconia ceramic. Iraqi J Laser.
2021;20(1):21-9.
30. Arıcıoğlu B, Hatipoğlu FP, Hatipoğlu Ö, Bahçeci İ. Comparison of
Er: YAG modalities (PIPS-SWEEPS) on eliminating of Enterococcus
Faecalis populations. Selcuk Dent J. 2021;8(3):750-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.805466.
31. Teplitsky PE, Chenail BL, Mack B, Machnee CH. Endodontic
irrigation: a comparison of endosonic and syringe delivery
systems. Int Endod J. 1987;20(5):233-41. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00620.x. PMid:3481785.
32. van der Sluis LWM, Vogels MPJM, Verhaagen B, Macedo R,
Wesselink PR. Study on the influence of refreshment/activation
cycles and irrigants on mechanical cleaning efficiency during
ultrasonic activation of the irrigant. J Endod. 2010;36(4):737-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.004. PMid:20307755.
33. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review
of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices.
J Endod. 2009;35(6):791-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
joen.2009.03.010. PMid:19482174.
34. Olivi G. Laser use in endodontics: evolution from direct
laser irradiation to laser-activated irrigation. J Laser Dent.
2013;21(2):58-71.
35. Aydin SA, Taşdemir T, Buruk CK, Çelik D. Efficacy of erbium,
chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium and garnet laser-
activated irrigation compared with passive ultrasonic Irrigation,
conventional irrigation, and photodynamic therapy against
Enterococcus faecalis.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21(1):11-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2727.
PMid:32381794.
36. Sahar-Helft S, Stabholtz A, Moshonov J, Gutkin V, Redenski I,
Steinberg D. Effect of Er: YAG laser-activated irrigation solution
on
Enterococcus faecalis
biofilm in an
ex-vivo
root canal
model. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31(7):334-41. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1089/pho.2012.3445. PMid:23763481.
Ghufran Ismail Ibrahim
(Corresponding address)
University of Baghdad, Institute of Laser for Postgraduate Studies, Baghdad, Iraq
Email: ghofran.ismail2102m@ilps.uobaghdad.edu.iq Date submitted: 2023 Jun 01
Accept submission: 2024 Jan 26