11
Braz Dent Sci 2024 Apr/June;27 (2): e4234
Al-Khafaji AM et al.
Poly ether keton keton polymer deposition on laser surface structured commercial pure titanium using magnetron sputtering
Al-Khafaji AM et al. Poly ether keton keton polymer deposition on laser surface
structured commercial pure titanium using magnetron
sputtering
study at update course. Braz Dent Sci. 2015;18(4):98-103. http://
doi.org/10.14295/bds.2015.v18i4.1157.
6. Najeeb S, Bds ZK, Bds SZ, Bds MS. Bioactivity and Osseointegration
of PEEK Are Inferior to Those of Titanium: A Systematic Review.
J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(6):512-6. http://doi.org/10.1563/
aaid-joi-D-16-00072. PMid:27560166.
7. Zafar MS, Fareed MA, Riaz S, Latif M, Habib SR, Khurshid
Z. Customized therapeutic surface coatings for dental
implants. Coatings. 2020;10(6):568. http://doi.org/10.3390/
coatings10060568.
8. Fernandes VVB Jr, da Rosa PAA, Grisante LAD, Embacher FC,
Lopes BB, de Vasconcellos LGO,etal. Argon plasma application
on the surface of titanium implants: osseointegration study. Braz
Dent Sci. 2023;26(4):e3843. http://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.
e3843.
9. Mandracci P, Mussano F, Rivolo P, Carossa S. Surface treatments
and functional coatings for biocompatibility improvement and
bacterial adhesion reduction in dental implantology. Coatings.
2016;6(1):7. http://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6010007.
10. Simões IG, Dos Reis AC, da Costa Valente ML. Analysis of the
influence of surface treatment by high-power laser irradiation on
the surface properties of titanium dental implants: a systematic
review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(6):863-70. http://doi.
org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.026. PMid:34493390.
11. Dong H, Liu H, Zhou N, Li Q, Yang G, Chen L,et al. Surface
modified techniques and emerging functional coating of dental
implants. Coatings. 2020;10(11):1012. http://doi.org/10.3390/
coatings10111012.
12. Refaat MM, Hamad TI. Evaluation of mechanical and histological
significance of nano hydroxyapatite and nano zirconium oxide
coating on the osseointegration of CP Ti implants. J Bagh Coll
Dent. 2016;28(3):30-7. http://doi.org/10.12816/0031105.
13. Xu X, He L, Zhu B, Li J, Li J. Advances in polymeric materials for
dental applications. Polym Chem. 2017;8(5):807-23. http://doi.
org/10.1039/C6PY01957A.
14. Alqurashi H, Khurshid Z, Syed AUY, Rashid Habib S, Rokaya
D, Zafar MS. Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): an emerging
biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses. J Adv
Res. 2021;28:87-95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.09.004.
PMid:33384878.
15. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M,
Gernet W,etal. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond
strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1278-88.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014. PMid:24969411.
16. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding
to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and
influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):357-63.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008. PMid:24461250.
17. Fayad NMEH, Bahig DE. The effect of different framework’s
material on strain induced in distal abutment in mandibular
Kennedy’s class II: an in-vitro study. Braz Dent Sci.
2023;26(3):e3775. http://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3775.
18. Ma C, Zhao C, Fan X, Liu Z, Liu J. Preparation of non-
stoichiometric Al2O3 film with broadband antireflective by
magnetron sputtering. Chem Phys Lett. 2021;v:138299. http://
doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.138299.
19. Safi IN, Hussein BMA, Aljudy HJ, Tukmachi MS. Effects of
long durations of rf-magnetron sputtering deposition of
hydroxyapatite on titanium dental implants. Eur J Dent.
2021;15(3):440-7. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721314.
PMid:33511600.
20. Yokota S, Nishiwaki N, Ueda K, Narushima T, Kawamura H,
Takahashi T. Evaluation of thin amorphous calcium phosphate
coatings on titanium dental implants deposited using magnetron
sputtering. Implant Dent. 2014;23(3):343-50. http://doi.
org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000098. PMid:24819811.
21. Akhtar M, Uzair S, Rizwan M, Ur Rehman MA. The improvement in
surface properties of metallic implant via magnetron sputtering:
recent progress and remaining challenges. Front Mater.
2022;8:747169. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.747169.
22. Yonggang Y, Wolke JG, Yubao L, Jansen JA. In vitro evaluation
of different heat-treated radio frequency magnetron
sputtered calcium phosphate coatings. Clin Oral Implants
Res. 2007;18(3):345-53. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-
0501.2006.01332.x. PMid:17298487.
23. Hung K-Y, Lai H-C, Feng H-P. Characteristics of RF-Sputtered
Thin Films of Calcium Phosphate on Titanium Dental
Implants. Coatings. 2017;7(8):126. http://doi.org/10.3390/
coatings7080126.
24. Gökmenoğlu CEREN, Özmeriç N, Çakal G, Dökmetaş N, Ergene
C, Kaftanoğlu B. Coating of titanium implants with boron nitride
by RF-magnetron sputtering. Bull Mater Sci. 2016;39(5):1363-70.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-016-1273-0.
25. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
2nd ed. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
26. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power
analyses using G* Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression
analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60. http://doi.
org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. PMid:19897823.
27. Godara A, Raabe D, Green S. The influence of sterilization
processes on the micromechanical properties of carbon fiber-
reinforced PEEK composites for bone implant applications.
Acta Biomater. 2007;3(2):209-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.
actbio.2006.11.005. PMid:17236831.
28. Verma A. Novel innovations in dental implant biomaterials
science: zirconia and PEEK polymers. Int J Appl Dent Sci.
2018;4(4):25-9.
29. Togni F, Baras F, Ribas Mde O, Taha MO. Histomorphometric
analysis of bone tissue repair in rabbits after insertion of titanium
screws under different torque. Acta Cir Bras. 2011;26(4):261-
6. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502011000400003.
PMid:21808837.
30. Medina CEB, Rafael CF, Volpato CAM, Özcan M, de Vasconcelos
DK. Evaluation of removal torque values for titanium screws
of prosthetic abutments after different torque application
techniques: in vitro study. Braz Dent Sci. 2016;19(4):12-8. http://
doi.org/10.14295/bds.2016.v19i4.1295.
31. Muna N, Rahman HA. Mechanical Evaluation of Pure Titanium
Dental Implants Coated with a Mixture of Nano Titanium Oxide
and Nano Hydroxyapatite. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2016;28(3):38-43.
http://doi.org/10.12816/0031106.
32. Inci SD, Turp V, Tuncelli FB. Stress distribution in peri-implant
bone, implants, and prostheses: 3D-FEA of marginal bone loss
and prosthetic design. Braz Dent Sci. 2024;27(2):e4168. http://
doi.org/10.4322/bds.2024.e4168.
33. Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller WD. Flexural
behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater.
2015;31(11):1377-84. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.151.
PMid:26361808.
34. Song CH, Choi JW, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lee SH, Kang
ES,et al. Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of
a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with
Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements.
Materials (Basel). 2018;11(6):916. http://doi.org/10.3390/
ma11060916. PMid:29844270.
35. Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional
dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated
with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1):1-12. http://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01826.x. PMid:20070743.