The finish line location of the cemented crown is an influencing factor for tensile bond strength, marginal adaption and nanoleakage?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i2.1924Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different crowns finishing line location on the crown tensile bond strength, marginal adaption and nanoleakage. Material and Methods: Sixty healthy third molars were collected. For tensile bond strength, a self-adhesive resin cement was used. For marginal adaption, epoxy resin models were prepared. Prior to tensile bond strength test, images for the epoxy resin models were measured under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Nanoleakage was measured using same protocol. Failure mode was evaluated through SEM and classified: adhesive failure, cohesive in cement, cohesive in dentin, cohesive in resin composite, cohesive in enamel, and mixed. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov Smirnov normality tests, two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni (posthoc) parametric test, with significance level of 5% (P < .05), Spearman correlation test. Results: tensile bond strength was not statistically different between the cemented groups with composite resin and ceramic. Cementation of ceramic was not statistically different between the groups (enamel, 3.28 Pa; dentin, 3.14 Pa; resin, 2.85 Pa). Marginal adaption was statistically different between resin and ceramic; finish line location varied between enamel and resin (175.91 ?m vs. 433.58 ?m). Nanoleakage rate was statistically different among all groups, except for resin: with resin (9.49%) and ceramic (9.35%). There was a predominance of adhesive failure in all groups. Conclusion: finish line location can be performed safely in enamel and dentin. Composite resinas substrate present an alternative, but still need to be more studied. Regarding the crown’s material, it is possible to perform a satisfatory restoration in both: resin and ceramic. With ceramics presenting better results.
KEYWORDS
Resin composite; Ceramics; Tensile bond strengh; Marginal adaption; Nanoleakage.
References
Al-Haj Ali SN. In vitro coParison of marginal and internal fit between stainless steel crowns and esthetic crowns of primary molars using different luting cements. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Nov 12;16(6):366-371.
Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K. Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic Complete Veneer Crowns. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):ZC67-ZC70. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21447.9028.
Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:436–42.
Pfeifer CS. Polymer-Based Direct Filling Materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(4):733- 750.
Cortellini D, Canale A. Bonding lithium disilicate ceramic to feather-edge tooth preparations: a minimally invasive treatment concept. J Adhes Dent. 2012 Feb;14(1):7-10. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a22708.
Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I, Abu Zaghlan R, Steier L. Longevity of Self-etch Dentin Bonding Adhesives CoPared to Etch-and-rinse Dentin Bonding Adhesives: A Systematic Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016 Jun;16(2):96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.03.003.
Minyé HM, Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, Mungia R, Meyerowitz C, Louis DR, Slootsky A, Gordan VV, McCracken MS; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Preparation Techniques Used to Make Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Prosthodont. 2018 Dec;27(9):813-820. doi:10.1111/jopr.12988. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
Barizon KT, Bergeron C, Vargas MA, Qian F, Cobb DS, Gratton DG, Geraldeli S. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers: part II. Effect of material, shade, and thickness on translucency. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.016.
Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011.
Oh SC, Dong JK, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Strength and microstructure of IPS Empress 2 glass- ceramic after different treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2000 Nov-Dec;13(6):468-72.
Sasse M, Krummel A, Klosa K, Kern M. Influence of unitary crown thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic. Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):907-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.017.
Gianordoli-Neto R, Padovani GC, Mondelli J, de Lima Navarro MF, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL. Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resinin posterior teeth: A randomized controlled study. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):306-10. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.186446.
Ferracane JL. Composite resin– State of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38.
Johnson GH, Lepe X, Patterson A, Schäfer O. Simplified cementation of lithium disilicate crowns: Retention with various adhesive resin cement combinations. JProsthetDent. 018 May;119(5):826-832. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.012.
Cerqueira LAC, Costa AR, Spohr AM, Miyashita E, Miranzi BAS, Calabrez Filho S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Borges GA. Effect of Dentin Preparation Mode on the Bond Strength Between Human Dentin and Different Resin Cements. Braz Dent J. 2018 May-Jun;29(3):268- 274. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801809.
Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Aug;10(4):251-8.
Rohr N, Fischer J. Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Apr;9(2):85-92. doi:10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.85.
Manso AP, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Pegoraro TA, Dias RA, Carvalho RM. Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic unitary crowns. Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Apr;55(2):311-32, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.011.
Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incoPatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent.2003 Winter;5(4):267-82.
Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2481-92.
Kern M, Sasse M, Wolfart S. Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Mar;143(3):234-40.
Demir N, Ozturk A, Malkoc M (2014) Evaluation of the marginal fit of full ceramic crowns by the microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) technique. Eur J Dent 8:437–444.
Kim J, Jeong J, Lee J, Cho H (2016) Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. J Prosthet Dent 116:551–557.
Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005Oct;21(10):895-910.
Makishi P, André CB, Silva JL, Bacelar-Sá R, Correr-Sobrinho L, Giannini M. Effect of Storage Time on Bond Strength Performance of Multimode Adhesives to Indirect Composite resinand Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic. Oper Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):541-551.
Akoglu H. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
