This is an outdated version published on 2020-10-14. Read the most recent version.

Tooth color alteration after debonding in orthodontic patients with adhesive removal using composite bur or tungsten carbide bur: a single center, randomized controlled clinical trial

Authors

  • Amir Hooman Sadrhaghighi
  • Amir Mohammadi
  • Tannaz Abdollahzadeh Baghaei
  • Hamed Alipour

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i4.2140

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine whether recently developed fiber reinforced composite burs provided better results by comparing tooth discoloration after debonding of orthodontic brackets.

Methods: A split-mouth, randomized controlled trial was carried out in one orthodontic office; including 23 patients with intact, vital and caries-free four upper incisors aged 12 to 30 years who completed their fixed orthodontic treatment. For each patient, upper central and lateral incisors on each side of the mouth were randomly selected to remove the adhesive with either a tungsten carbide bur (TC) (n = 46) or a fiber-reinforced composite bur (FC) (n=46). Color evaluation of each tooth was conducted at two time points: immediately after finishing and polishing procedure and two months afterwards. The primary outcome would be the amount of color change in each group during the post treatment phase. The participants, the person assessing the color change and the statistician were blinded to TC group assignment. Color changes in each group were analyzed with the Paired T-test. The color change corresponding to the resin removal method was also statistically analyzed with the Independent T-test at ?=0.05 as the level of significance.

Results: 86 teeth, 43 in each group, were analyzed. The ?E value was 3.713±1.161, for teeth finished TC and 2.114±0.514 for teeth finished with FC (p<0.01).

Conclusion: adhesive removal with FC bur results in a more color-resistant tooth surface in comparison with tungsten carbide bur.

References

Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC oral health. 2011;11(1):6.

Arhun N, Arman A, editors. Effects of orthodontic mechanics on tooth enamel: a review. Semin Orthod; 2007: Elsevier.

Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Szatkiewicz T, Tomkowski R, Tandecka K, Grocholewicz K. Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel–current knowledge and future perspectives–a systematic review. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:1991.

Silverstone L, Saxton C, Dogon I, Fejerskov O. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res. 1975;9(5):373-87.

Al Maaitah EF, Omar AAA, Al-Khateeb SN. Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances bonded with different etching techniques on tooth color: a prospective clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(1):43-9.

Eliades T, Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Bradley TG. Comparison of enamel colour changes associated with orthodontic bonding using two different adhesives. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(1):85-90.

Sandison R. Tooth surface appearance after debonding. Br J Orthod. 1981;8(4):199-201.

Inokoshi S, Burrow M, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1996;21:73-80.

Karamouzos A, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA, Kolokithas G. Tooth-color assessment after orthodontic treatment: a prospective clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(5):537. e1-. e8.

Chen Q, Zheng X, Chen W, Ni Z, Zhou Y. Influence of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on enamel color: a systematic review. BMC oral health. 2015;15(1):31.

Cehreli ZC, Lakshmipathy M, Yazici R. Effect of different splint removal techniques on the surface roughness of human enamel: a three?dimensional optical profilometry analysis. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(2):177-82.

Smith S, Walsh L, Taverne A. Removal of orthodontic bonding resin residues by CO2 laser radiation: surface effects. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999;17(1):13-8.

Karan S, Kircelli BH, Tasdelen B. Enamel surface roughness after debonding: comparison of two different burs. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(6):1081-8.

Ahrari F, Akbari M, Akbari J, Dabiri G. Enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran). 2013;10(1):82.

Campbell PM. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(2):103-10.

Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(6):717-24.

Ireland A, Hosein I, Sherriff M. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(4):413-9.

Zachrisson BU, Årthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod. 1979;75(2):121-37.

Tuzcel NY, Akkaya M, Karacaoglu F. A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Polishing Methods on Tooth Surface Roughness. 2018.

Kamber R, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Does orthodontic treatment have a permanent effect on tooth color? Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2018;79(2):73-82.

Boncuk Y, Çehreli ZC, Polat-Özsoy Ö. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration. Angle Orthod. 2013;84(4):634-41.

Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):193-9.

Johnston W, Kao E. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989;68(5):819-22.

Seghi RR, Hewlett E, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res. 1989;68(12):1760-4.

Joo H-J, Lee Y-K, Lee D-Y, Kim Y-J, Lim Y-K. Influence of orthodontic adhesives and clean-up procedures on the stain susceptibility of enamel after debonding. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(2):334-40.

Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2004;32:3-12.

Özer T, Ba?aran G, Kama JD. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(3):368-74.

Berger SB, Palialol ARM, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23(1):34-43.

Eliades T, Gioka C, Heim M, Eliades G, Makou M. Color stability of orthodontic adhesive resins. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(3):391-3.

Trakyal? G, Özdemir FI, Arun T. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(4):397-401.

Ye C, Zhao Z, Zhao Q, Du X, Ye J, Wei X. Comparison of enamel discoloration associated with bonding with three different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with four different procedures. J Dent. 2013;41:e35-e40.

Leibrock A, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Behr M, Handel G. Colour stability of visible light-curing hybrid composites. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1997;5(3):125-30.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30 — Updated on 2020-10-14

Versions

Issue

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research Manuscript