Diagnostic reliability of a simplified epidemiologic tool to detect high-risk overjet for dental trauma.

Authors

  • Andressa Reisen Department of Public Health – São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Center – Campinas – SP – Brazil.
  • Alessandra Ramos Parpaiola Department of Dentistry – FAESA – Vitória – ES – Brazil.
  • Arlete Maria Gomes Oliveira Department of Public Health – São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Center – Campinas – SP – Brazil.
  • Luciane Zanin Department of Public Health – Hermínio Ometto University Center (UNIARARAS) – Araras – SP – Brazil.
  • Flávia Martão Flório Department of Public Health – São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Center – Campinas – SP – Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2015.v18i4.1167

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic reliability of a simplified tool to detect high-risk overjet for dental trauma. Material and Methods: The study population was composed of 131 volunteers divided into two groups according to the overjet measurement in terms of risk for traumatic dental injury (GRAB: risk absent and GRPR: risk present). The distance between the most prominent labial surface and its corresponding counterpart was measured using both the conventional (WHO, 1997) and the simplified tool. The measurements were taken independently and on separate occasions by two previously calibrated dental surgeons (Kappa=0.86). The gold standard method, as recommended by the WHO (1997), was performed by an external examiner. The simplified method, based on pencil-marked wooden tongue depressors was carried out in a blind manner by the other examiner. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the classification of risk for dental trauma in terms of overjet using the simplified method and compared to the conventional method. Results: The results revealed high values for sensitivity (S=1), specificity (E=0.93), positive (PPV=0.95) and negative predictive value (NPV=1). Conclusion: The examination using the simplified tool was reliable in identifying high-risk overjet, thus offering an alternative to the conventional examination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-21

How to Cite

1.
Reisen A, Parpaiola AR, Oliveira AMG, Zanin L, Flório FM. Diagnostic reliability of a simplified epidemiologic tool to detect high-risk overjet for dental trauma. BDS [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 21 [cited 2025 Aug. 21];18(4):68-75. Available from: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1167

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 4 (2015): Oct. - Dec. / 2015 - Published November 2015

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research

License

Brazilian Dental Science uses the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license, thus preserving the integrity of articles in an open access environment. The journal allows the author to retain publishing rights without restrictions.

=================

COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
 (PDF)

For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).

The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.

This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.

Most read articles by the same author(s)