Marginal leakage of temporary restoration after intraradicular post preparation with or without waterproofing

Authors

  • Leopoldo Cosme-Silva Department of Clinics and Surgery – School of Dentistry – Federal University of Alfenas – Alfenas – MG – Brazil.
  • Naiana Viana Viola Department of Clinics and Surgery – School of Dentistry – Federal University of Alfenas – Alfenas – MG – Brazil.
  • Leon Franco de Carvalho Department of Clinics and Surgery – School of Dentistry – Federal University of Alfenas – Alfenas – MG – Brazil.
  • Rayana Duarte Khoury São Paulo State University (Unesp) – Institute of Science and Technology – São José dos Campos – Department of Restorative Dentistry – SP – Brazil.
  • Joao Eduardo Gomes Filho School of Dentistry at Araçatuba – Department of Restorative Dentistry – Araçatuba – SP – Brazil.
  • Elaine Manso Oliveira Franco de Carvalho Department of Clinics and Surgery – School of Dentistry – Federal University of Alfenas – Alfenas – MG – Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2017.v20i2.1411

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the leakage volume of 1% Rhodamine B which received or not an internal waterproofing material. The hypothesis is that the waterproofing reduces microleakage. Material and Methods: Forty-two human teeth were selected for this study. After access, preparation, and filling of root canals, the teeth were divided into 3 groups: GI – sealed with Cimpat Blanc®, without intraradicular post/core preparation; GII - sealed with Cimpat Blanc®, with intraradicular post/core preparation, and GIII – sealed with Cimpat Blanc®, with intraradicular post/core preparation and internal waterproofing material with ethyl cyanoacrylate. T-test was used to analyze difference between initial and final weight and there was difference (p < 0.05). To analyze infiltration of the colorant, the volume was the comparison variable. Results: Shapiro Wilk- test was applied and showed normal distribution of the variables. ANOVA (p = 0.0013 / p<5%) applied and determined a statistical difference between the groups. When comparing the groups together, GIII show the smallest leakage rate when compared with the other groups, being statistically different (Tukey test - p < 0.5). Conclusion: In endodontically treated teeth receiving temporary restoration, the use of ethyl cyanoacrylate as internal waterproofing material is effective in preventing microleakage.

Keywords

Dental leakage; Endodontics; Dental restoration, temporary; Coloring agents.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-28

Issue

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research