Influence of surface treatments in flexural strength and superficial topography of a lithium disilicate ceramic

Authors

  • Natalia Rivoli Rossi Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil.
  • Tabata do Prado Sato Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil
  • Caroline Cotes Marinho Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil
  • Vanessa Cruz Macedo Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil
  • Tarcisio José de Arruda Paes Junior Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics – São José dos Campos - SP – Brazil.
  • Estevão Tomomitsu Kimpara Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics – São José dos Campos - SP – Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2019.v22i3.1678

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of different surface post-etching treatments in flexural strength, contact angle and surface roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic. 60 bars (16x2x4mm) were divided in six groups (n=10): C, no treatment; HF, hydrofluoric acid for 20s (HF) + washing (60s), drying (30s); HFL, HF + washing (60s), drying (30s) and luting; HFNL, HF + washing (60s) + neutralization with sodium bicarbonate (SB) for 40s + washing (5s), drying (30s) and luting; HFUL, HF + washing (60s) + ultrasonic bath (UB) for 4 min, drying (30s) and luting; HFNUL, HF + washing (60s) + SB (40s) + UB (4 min) and luting. The bars were submitted to three-points flexural strength test. To analyze roughness and contact angle 25 ceramic blocks (12x7x7 mm) were divided into five groups (n=5): C - no treatment; HF - HF ; HFU - HF and UB for 5 min ; HFN - HF and SB; HFNU - HF, UB and SB. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysed the surface of the samples. ANOVA one-way statistical analysis was done for comparison of results. There was no statistical difference for flexural strength (p-value=0.15) and for surface roughness (p-valor=0.15). However, it was obtained statistically significant difference for contact angle (p-valor=0.00). SEM images showed precipitates after the acid etching, which were removed by post-etching treatments. It can be concluded that the different post-etching surface treatments did not increase the flexural strength, surface roughness and ceramic wetting, but it influenced the SEM images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natalia Rivoli Rossi, Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil.

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics

Tabata do Prado Sato, Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics

Caroline Cotes Marinho, Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics

Vanessa Cruz Macedo, Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – SP - Brazil

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics

Tarcisio José de Arruda Paes Junior, Univ Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos – Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics – São José dos Campos - SP – Brazil.

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics

Downloads

Published

2019-07-30

How to Cite

1.
Rossi NR, Sato T do P, Marinho CC, Macedo VC, Paes Junior TJ de A, Kimpara ET. Influence of surface treatments in flexural strength and superficial topography of a lithium disilicate ceramic. BDS [Internet]. 2019 Jul. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 21];22(3):305-12. Available from: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1678

Issue

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2