Evaluation of the bond strength of orthodontic brackets and the degree of polymerisation and microhardness of an orthodontic adhesive using polyvawe light curing unit and varying light densities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i4.2044Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the shear bond strength (SBS) and Vickers micro-hardness (VHN) of the orthodontic adhesive resin Transbond XT using thermocycled samples. The study also measures the degree of cure by poliwave light curing unit Valo. Materials and Methods: 135 brackets were bonded for the SBS test, and 90 disc-shaped orthodontic adhesive resins were prepared for the VHN test. The measurements were taken either immediately or after 500 or 10.0000 thermocycling. The SBS and VHN test data were statistically evaluated using a Two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests. The degree of conversion (DC) was measured by FTIR. Results: The 10-sec polymerized control group (57.08) and the 10.000 termocycled samples (55.96) had the highest VHN scores. On the other hand, the 3 second polymerized and the 10.000 termocycled samples (39.22) had the lowest VHN scores. There was no significant difference in the bracket SBS values between the termocycled and immediate groups. An evaluation of the bond failure surfaces revealed that the ARI scores did not differ between the immediate and the thermo-cycled groups according to the power modes. The FTIR results revealed that the lowest DC was seen in the 3 second light-cured sample. Conclusion: Transbond XT provided sufficient bonding in terms of microhardness and DC under in vitro bracket bonding conditions after 10 and 8 seconds of Poliwave LED curing. However, low mean values were seen in the groups that received Poliwave LED curing for only 3 seconds.
KEYWORDS
ARI score; FTIR; Light-Emitting Diode; Orthodontics; Thermocycling.
References
Kachoei M, Mohammadi A, Esmaili Moghaddam M, Rikhtegaran S, Pourghaznein M, Shirazi S. Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO2 laser. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3):148-54. doi:10.15171/joddd.2016.024
Silta YT, Dunn WJ, Peters CB. Effect of shorter polymerization times when using the latest generation of light-emitting diodes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(6):744-8. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.029
Gronberg K, Rossouw PE, Miller BH, Buschang P. Distance and time effect on shear bond strength of brackets cured with a second-generation light-emitting diode unit. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):682-8. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0682:DATEOS]2.0.CO;2
Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(3):274-6. doi:10.1067/mod.2002.125712
Mandall NA, Millett DT, Mattick CR, Hickman J, Worthington HV, Macfarlane TV. Orthodontic adhesives: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2002;29(3):205-195. doi:10.1093/ortho/29.3.205
Swanson T, Dunn WJ, Childers DE, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(3):337-41. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.011
Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, Klersy C. Plasma arc versus halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 12-month clinical study of bond failures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(3):342-7. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.008
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Sfondrini G. A xenon arc light-curing unit for bonding and bleaching. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34(2):94-6.
Segreto DR, Naufel FS, Brandt WC, Guiraldo RD, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Influence of photoinitiator and light-curing source on bond strength of experimental resin cements to dentin. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(1):83-9. doi:10.1590/0103-6440201600387
Abedin F, Ye Q, Parthasarathy R, Misra A, Spencer P. Polymerization behavior of hydrophilic-rich phase of dentin adhesive. J Dent Res. 2015;94(3):500-7. doi:10.1177/0022034514565646
Mousavinasab SM, Atai M, Salehi N, Salehi A. Effect of Shade and Light Curing Mode on the Degree of Conversion of Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composites. J Dent Biomater, 2016;3(4):299-305.
Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115(1):24-8. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70312-4
Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2(3):171-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228x.1975.11743666
Oztürk B, Malkoç S, Koyutürk AE, Catalbas B, Ozer F. Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(4):407-12. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn006
Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119(1):30-5. doi:10.1067/mod.2001.111399
Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119(1):54-8. doi:10.1067/mod.2001.109888
Oz AA, Oz AZ, Arici S. In-vitro bond strengths and clinical failure rates of metal brackets bonded with different light-emitting diode units and curing times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149(2):212-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.036
Uşümez S, Büyükyilmaz T, Karaman AI. Effect of light-emitting diode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(2):259-63. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0259:EOLDOB>2.0.CO;2
Sena LMF, Barbosa HAM, Caldas SGFR, Ozcan M, Souza ROAE. Effect of different bonding protocols on degree of monomer conversion and bond strength between orthodontic brackets and enamel. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e58. Published 2018 Jun 11. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0058
Sharma S, Tandon P, Nagar A, Singh GP, Singh A, Chugh VK. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. J Orthod Sci. 2014;3(2):29-33. doi:10.4103/2278-0203.132892
Almeida LF, Martins LP, Martins RP. Effects of reducing light-curing time of a high-power LED device on shear bond strength of brackets. J Orofac Orthop. 2018;79(5):352-8. doi:10.1007/s00056-018-0146-0
Faria-E-Silva AL, Covell DA Jr, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS. Effectiveness of high irradiance for short-time exposures on polymerization of composite under metal brackets. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(6):834-40. doi:10.2319/051817-338.1
Cerekja E, Cakirer B. Effect of short curing times with a high-intensity light-emitting diode or high-power halogen on shear bond strength of metal brackets before and after thermocycling. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(3):510-6. doi:10.2319/071810-412.1
Proffit WR, Fields Jr FH. Contemporary orthodontics contemporary fixed appliances. St.Louis : Mosby; 2000. p. 385-417.
Shin DH, Rawls HR. Degree of conversion and color stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitiator systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):1030-8. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.004
Bang HC, Lim BS, Yoon TH, Lee YK, Kim CW. Effect of plasma arc curing on polymerization shrinkage of orthodontic adhesive resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(8):803-10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01301.x
Abedin F, Ye Q, Camarda K, Spencer P. Impact of light intensity on the polymerization kinetics and network structure of model hydrophobic and hydrophilic methacrylate based dental adhesive resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016;104(8):1666-78. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33517
Lovell LG, Newman SM, Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res. 1999;78(8):1469-76. doi:10.1177/00220345990780081301
Cerveira GP, Berthold TB, Souto AA, Spohr AM, Marchioro EM. Degree of conversion and hardness of an orthodontic resin cured with a light-emitting diode and a quartz-tungsten-halogen light. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(1):83-6. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp048
Albers HF. Tooth Color Restoratives. 9th ed. London: BC Decker Inc; 2002
Souza ROO, Michida SM, de Melo RM, Pavanelli CA, Bottino MA, Soares LE, et al. Conversion degree of indirect resin composites and effect of thermocycling on their physical properties. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(3):218-25. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00551.x
