Clinical Performance of Direct Anterior Composite Restorations Using Esthetic Dual-Shade versus Polychromatic Natural Layering Technique: a split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i4.2064Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the clinical performance of the dual shade layering and polychromatic resin composite layering techniques using a randomized controlled trail. Material and Methods: 42 participants (84 restorations) of class IV or class III through and through within a pair of anterior contra-lateral teeth were randomly allocated into two groups according to technique of composite restoration placement: control “polychromatic layering” and intervention “dual-shade layering”. Follow-up was done at 1 month (baseline) and 1 year. Restorations were evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), restoration color shade match using Vita Easyshade V ®, and blinded assessor using FDI criteria for assessment of dental restorations measuring (aesthetic properties). Chi-square test was used to compare between restorations of both techniques. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between restorations of both techniques for patient satisfaction outcome, restorations color match outcome, and for all tested FDI outcomes except surface luster with 100% success. Conclusion: Both dual-shade layering and polychromatic natural layering techniques, exhibited acceptable clinical and esthetic performance.
Keywords
Composite; Polychromatic layering technique; Dual-shade layering technique; Clinical performance.
References
Ardu S, Braut V, Uhac I, Benbachir N, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. Influence of mechanical and chemical degradation on surface gloss of resin composite materials. Am J Dent. 2009 Oct;22(5):264–8.
Ardu S, Krejci I. Biomimetic direct composite stratification technique for the restoration of anterior teeth. Quintessence Int. 2006 Mar;37(3):167–74.
Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):146–65.
Chu SJ, Devigus A, Mieleszko AJ. Fundamentals of color: shade matching and communication in esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Company Illinois; 2004.
Betrisey E, Krejci I, Di Bella E, Ardu S. The influence of stratification on color and appearance of resin composites. Odontology. 2016 May;104(2):176–83.
Dietschi D, Fahl NJ. Shading concepts and layering techniques to master direct anterior composite restorations: an update. Br Dent J. 2016 Dec;221(12):765–71.
Nahsan FPS, Mondelli RFL, Franco EB, Naufel FS, Ueda JK, Schmitt VL, et al. Clinical strategies for esthetic excellence in anterior tooth restorations: understanding color and composite resin selection. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(2):151–6.
Gueli AM, Pedullà E, Pasquale S, La Rosa GR, Rapisarda E. Color specification of two new resin composites and influence of stratification on their chromatic perception. Color Res Appl. 2017;42(5):684–92.
Ryan E-A, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a84.
Vanini¬¬¬ L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996 Sep;8(7):673–82; quiz 684.
Fahl NJ. Achieving ultimate anterior esthetics with a new microhybrid composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000;(26):4–13; quiz 26.
Ostervemb N, Jorgensen JN, Horsted-Bindslev P. A new approach to compare the esthetic properties of different composite materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Aug;23(4):238–46.
Beddis HP, Nixon PJ. Layering composites for ultimate aesthetics in direct restorations. Dent Update. 2012;39(9):630–6.
Milnar FJ. Achieving natural aesthetics in Class IV restorations. Dent Today. 2012;31(1):144–6.
Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position. Clin Oral Investig. 1997;1(1):12–8.
Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2009.
Vargas M. Conservative Aesthetic Enhancement of the Anterior Dentinion Using a Predictable Direct Resin Protocol. Pract Proced Aesthetic Dent. 2006;18(8):501.
Ishida Y, Fujimoto K, Higaki N, Goto T, Ichikawa T. End points and assessments in esthetic dental treatment. J Prosthodont Res. 2015;59(4):229–35.
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):349–66.
Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall ACC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: the impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength. Dent Mater. 2009;25(2):188–97.
Ten Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness. J Dent Res. 1995;74(1):374–80.
Baratieri LN, Araujo E, Monteiro Jr S. Color in natural teeth and direct resin composite restorations: Essential aspects. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2007;2(2).
Manauta J, Salat A, Putignano A, Devoto W, Paolone G, Hardan LS. Stratification in anterior teeth using one dentine shade and a predefined thickness of enamel: a new concept in composite layering–Part I. Odontostomatol Trop. 2014;37.
Fahl Jr N. A polychromatic composite layering approach for solving a complex Class IV/direct veneer-diastema combination: part I. Pr Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006;18(10):641–5.
Mulimani PS. Evidence-based practice and the evidence pyramid: A 21st century orthodontic odyssey. Elsevier; 2017.
Shaalan OO, Abou-Auf E, El Zoghby AF. Clinical evaluation of flowable resin composite versus conventional resin composite in carious and noncarious lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2017;20(6):380.
Celik EU, Aka B, Yilmaz F. Six-month clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive flowable composite in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(4):361–8.
Romero MF, Haddock FJ, Freites AG, Brackett WW, Brackett MG. Restorative technique selection in class IV direct composite restorations: a simplified method. Oper Dent. 2016;41(3):243–8.
Ruschel VC, Martins M V, Bernardon JK, Maia HP. Color match between composite resin and tooth remnant in Class IV restorations: a case series. Oper Dent. 2018;43(5):460–6.
Baratieri LN, Ritter A V, Swift Jr EJ. To bevel or not in anterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(4):264.
Mackenzie L, Parmar D, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Direct anterior composites: a practical guide. Dent Update. 2013;40(4):297–317.
Lopes IAD, Monteiro PJVC, Mendes JJB, Goncalves JMR, Caldeira FJF. The effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of two nanocomposites. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(3):197–207.
Afroz S, Rathi S, Rajput G, Rahman SA. Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: A campus based survey of North Indian University students. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(4):455–60.
Khurana R, Tredwin CJ, Weisbloom M, Moles DR. A clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices. Br Dent J. 2007;203(12):675.
Kielbassa AM, Beheim-Schwarzbach NJ, Neumann K, Zantner C. In vitro comparison of visual and computer-aided pre-and post-tooth shade determination using various home bleaching procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(2):92–100.
Hickel R, Roulet J-F, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjoer IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations includi. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:121–47.
Marquillier T, Doméjean S, Le Clerc J, Chemla F, Gritsch K, Maurin J-C, et al. The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: A scoping review. J Dent. 2018;68:1–9.
Naeimi Akbar H, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Van Noort R. Relationship between color and translucency of multishaded dental composite resins. Int J Dent. 2012;2012.
Cadenaro M, Marchesi G, Antoniolli F, Davidson C, Dorigo EDS, Breschi L. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater. 2009;25(5):649–54.
Aslam A, Ahmed B, AZAD AALI, OVAIS N, NAYYER M. Layers to a beautiful smile: composite resin stratification. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2016;36(2).
Harris ED. Multi-Shade Composite Layering. J Cosmet Dent. 2017;33(1).
Ragain J. A Review of Color Science in Dentistry: Colorimetry and Color Space. J Dent Oral Disord Ther. 2016 Jan 26;4:1–5.
Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38:e2–16.
Moodley DS, Patel N, Moodley T, Ranchod H. Comparison of colour differences in visual versus spectrophotometric shade matching. South African Dent J. 2015;70(9):402–7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
(PDF)
For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).
The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.
This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.
