Applicability of cone beam computed tomography gray values for estimation of primary stability of dental implants
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between bone density measured by computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (Sirona’s Galileos scanner) with primary stability of dental implants. Material and methods: 20 fresh bovine femoral heads were prepared by removal of soft tissue, sectioning of the bone, and placement of markers for location and angulation of implants. Bone density of peri-implant areas was determined preoperatively by CT and CBCT scanning of the prepared bone samples represented by Hounsfield units (HUs) and gray values (GVs), respectively. Then, 60 implants in three sizes (diameter = 4 mm, length = 8, 10, and 12 mm) were inserted into the bones and maximum insertion torque (IT) was recorded. Osstell device was also used for determining the implant stability quotient (ISQ) for each implant. Statistical analysis was performed on the data (alpha = 0.05). Results: Mean ± SD values of GV, HU, and ISQ were 1592.75 ± 231.82, 675.26 ± 115.38 and 61.90 ± 10.14, respectively. Moreover, the most frequent IT limit was 30-35 Ncm (41.4%). Significant relationships were observed between HU and IT, GV and IT, HU and ISQ, GV and ISQ, and IT and ISQ in all implant sizes. Moreover, GV and HU also significantly correlated to each other. Conclusion: Bone density values in CBCT and CT scans are positively associated to primary stability of dental implants. Therefore, GVs obtained from Galileos CBCT scanner can be used for preoperative selection of edentulous sites which allow for better implant stability or locations which require further procedures for enhancing the success rate of dental implants.
Computed tomography; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implant.
Lioubavina‐Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(3):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x
Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent. 2010;38(8):612-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.013
Turkyilmaz I. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(10):754-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01631.x
O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(1):48-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00027.x
Wu S-W, Lee C-C, Fu P-Y, Lin S-C. The effects of flute shape and thread profile on the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(7):797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.021
Hiasa K, Abe Y, Okazaki Y, Nogami K, Mizumachi W, Akagawa Y. Preoperative computed tomography-derived bone densities in Hounsfield units at implant sites acquired primary stability. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011. doi: 10.5402/2011/678729
Zix J, Hug S, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(3):525-30.
Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2007;78(2):262-72. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060143
Farré-Pagès N, Augé-Castro ML, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferrés-Padró E, Hernández-Alfaro F. Relation between bone density and primary implant stability. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(1):e62-7. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e62
Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(5):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x
Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-8-32
Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2(3):137-41.
Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(1):79-84. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75.
de Castro Lopes SLP, da Costa Donato ISQ, de Assis ACS, de Moraes MEL, Manhães Jr LRC, de Oliveria Gamba T. Anatomic characterization of mentual foramen in dentate and edentulous regions with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Braz Dent Sci. 2016;19(4):49-55. doi: 10.14295/bds.2016.v19i4.1305
de Castro Lopes SLP, Moraes MEL, Júnior LRCM, de Assis ACS, Giosa DT, Urbano DS. Incidental findings of bone alterations in temporomandibular joints in cone-beam computed tomography scans adquired for implants planning: the importance of complete field of view analysis. Braz Dent Sci. 2016;19(2):18-24. doi: 10.14295/bds.2016.v19i2.1243
Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Souza PC, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x
Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;44(1):20140238. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140238
Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone‐beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(7):832-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x
Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Avsever H, Özdemir T. Conventional multi‐slice computed tomography (CT) and cone‐beam CT (CBCT) for computer‐assisted implant placement. Part I: Relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(6):893-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00436.x
Pagliani L, Sennerby L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P. The relationship between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and lateral displacement of dental implants: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(3):221-7. doi: 10.1111/joor.12024
Sennerby L, Andersson P, Pagliani L, Giani C, Moretti G, Molinari M, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3 D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(5):844-53. doi: 10.1111/cid.12193
Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoğlan M, Öztunç H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):1016-21. doi: 10.1111/clr.12219
Wada M, Tsuiki Y, Suganami T, Ikebe K, Sogo M, Okuno I, et al. The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40729-014-0003-x
Valiyaparambil JV, Yamany I, Ortiz D, Shafer DM, Pendrys D, Freilich M, et al. Bone quality evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5):1271-7.
Mah P, Reeves T, McDavid W. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(6):323-35. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/19603304
Razi T, Niknami M, Ghazani FA. Relationship between hounsfield unit in CT scan and gray scale in CBCT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(2):107. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.019
Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Barbato E. How Accurate Is CBCT in Measuring Bone Density? A Comparative CBCT‐CT In Vitro Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):471-8. doi: 10.1111/cid.12027