Influence of traverse and waveone gold glider glide path files on the amount of apically extruded debris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3769Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different glide path files on the amount of apically extruded debris. Material and Methods: Sixty single-canaled mandibular premolars were accessed and randomly divided into three groups (n= 20) according to the file used for glid path creation; group A using Traverse file, group B using WaveOne Gold Glider, group C using stainless steel K file. All teeth were then instrumented using the Reciproc system. The debris extruded apically during instrumentation were collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes which were then stored in an incubator at 70 °C for 5 days. The weight of the dry extruded debris was established by subtracting the pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation weights of the Eppendorf tubes. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test, and post hoc analysis. Results: WaveOne Gold Glider produced the least amount of apical extruded debris (0.41±0.25) followed by the Traverse group (0.59±0.20) then the K-file group (0.64±0.16) with a statistically significant difference (p=0.003). Conclusion: Apical extrusion of debris is inevitable during root canal cleaning and shaping. Creation of glide path using engine-driven files produces less amount of apically extruded debris compared to hand-driven K-files.
KEYWORDS
Root canal preparation; Nickel titanium alloy; Dental instruments.
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
(PDF | Word)
All manuscript's copyright ownership of the article "____________________________________________________________________" is transferred from the author(s) to the BRAZILIAN DENTAL SCIENCE, in the event the work is published. The manuscript has not been published elsewhere and that it has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.
We hereby attest the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud or plagiarism. We made significant scientific contribution to the study and we are aware of the presented data and in agreement with the final version of the manuscript. We assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.
This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.
