Evaluation of different methods of calcium hydroxide removal from root canals with simulated internal resorptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2024.e4198Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated different methods of calcium hydroxide (CH) removal from root canals with simulated internal resorptions using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Material and Methods: Sixty acrylic resin blocks with simulated root canals and internal resorptions were prepared using a Reciproc R25 file and then filled with CH. The blocks were divided into five test groups (n=12) according to the method used for CH removal: hand files (HF), Easy Clean (EC), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), XP-Endo Finisher (XP), XP-Endo Finisher + PUI (XP+PUI). The blocks were scanned using a SkyScan 1172 scanner before and after CH removal to measure the volume and percentage of CH removal. The OriginPro 2017 software was used for statistical analyses. The level of significance was set at p<0.05 for all tests. Results: No method under study removed all CH. All methods had similar results in the cervical third (P>0.05). The percentage of CH removal was significantly greater in the area of internal resorption and along the total length of the canal in the XP+PUI group (P<0.05). The best results of CH removal were found in the apical third of roots in the XP+PUI and PUI groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: No method removed all CH from the root canals, but the combined XP+PUI method removed more CH than the other methods, especially from the area of the internal resorption.
KEYWORDS
Calcium hydroxide; Dental instruments; Dental pulp cavity; Root resorption; X-ray microtomography
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
(PDF)
For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).
The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.
This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.
