Effect of angulation of 3D printed resin provisional bridges: an in vitro study on hardness and fracture loading

Laís Maria de Barros Batista; Yan Victor Silva de Santana; Maria Terêza Lopes de Moura Borba; Tayná Karla Arruda e Silva; Clarisse Maria Luiz Silva; Antonio Torres; Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto; Viviane Maria Gonçalves de Figueiredo

doi:10.4322/bds.2025.e4581

Autores

Laís Maria de Barros Batista Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6810-6518
Yan Victor Silva de Santana Universidade do Estado de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4857-0232
Maria Terêza Lopes de Moura Borba Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4857-0232
Tayná Karla Arruda e Silva Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5060-5815
Clarisse Maria Luiz Silva Universidade do Estado de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-7285
Antonio Torres Universidade Estadual Paulista
Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto Universidade do Estado de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3162-8485
Viviane Maria Gonçalves de Figueiredo Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Prótese e Cirurgia Oral e Facial, Recife, PE, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-0984

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2025.e4581

Resumo

Objective: to evaluate the effect of printing angle of three-dimensional (3D) printed resin temporary bridges, through an in vitro study on hardness and fracture loading. Material and Methods: Specimens fixed bridges with three elements (N=5) and block specimens (N=1), were distributed among the experimental groups based on different printing angles: 0°, 45°, and 90°. Surface analysis using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was conducted on one specimen from each experimental group. Hardness testing was then performed, with the specimens receiving five measurements on a Vickers microhardness tester and for fracture loading testing, force was applied using a piston attached to a testing machine. Finally, the bridge specimens were evaluated for fracture. Fracture loading and hardness data were subjected to a Anova 1 Factor statistical test (p<0.05), while the findings from surface analysis and fractures were analyzed qualitatively. Results: On the surfaces of the specimens, printing layers were mainly observed in the 90° group for block-type specimens. For hardness analysis, the 3D printing angle showed statistical significance between groups (P=0.000), while no significant difference was found for fracture loading (P=0.177). Finally, there was a prevalence of all failures for the 0° and 90° groups and retainer fracture for the 45° group. Conclusion: Different angles of provisional bridges manufactured by 3D printed resin affect hardness, but do not interfere with fracture loading.

KEYWORDS

Angulation; Dental prosthesis; Digital technology; Provisional bridges; Three-dimensional printing.