Evaluation of apical leakage in root canals filled with different sealers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2012.v15i3.820Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the apical leakage exhibited by root canals filled with gutta-percha points and three different endodontic sealers. Material and Methods: Thirty-five human molars were used and had their palatal (maxillary molars) and distal roots (mandibular molars) sectioned, standardized and instrumented with Mtwo rotary system. The roots were filled through active lateral condensation technique and divided into three groups (n=10), according to the endodontic sealer employed: G1- AH Plus, G2- Fill Canal, G3- MTA Fillapex. All groups were filled by gutta-percha points and endodontic sealer. Gutta-percha points were immersed into sodium hypochlorite for 24 h to achieve disinfection. After the filling procedure, the roots were immersed into Indian ink for posterior diaphanization and obtainment of the images through stereomicroscopy. By analyzing the images in Adobe Illustrator CS5 software, the level of apical leakage was determined. The data obtained were submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests, with level of significance set at 5%. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between G1 and G3. G2 did not show statistically significant differences. G1 exhibited the smallest apical leakage mean (12.85), followed by G2 (109.84) and G3 (101.15). Conclusions: Root canal obturation with gutta-percha points and AH plus sealer through lateral condensation technique provided lower apical leakage rates than the other endodontic sealers evaluated.Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Brazilian Dental Science uses the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license, thus preserving the integrity of articles in an open access environment. The journal allows the author to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
=================
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
(PDF)
For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).
The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.
This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.
