Adhesion to eroded dentin submitted to different surface treatments

Autores

  • Thayanne Monteiro Ramos Oliveira Departamento de Dentística da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (USP).
  • Thaysa Monteiro Ramos Department of Restorative Dentistry – School of Dentistry – University of São Paulo (USP) – São Paulo – SP – Brazil.
  • Bruna Uglik Garbui Department of Restorative Dentistry – School of Dentistry – University of São Paulo (USP) – São Paulo – SP – Brazil.
  • Fernando Seishim Hanashiro Department of Restorative Dentistry – School of Dentistry – University of São Paulo (USP) – São Paulo – SP – Brazil.
  • Patricia Moreira de Freitas Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry – Department of Restorative Dentistry – School of Dentistry – University of São Paulo (USP) – São Paulo – SP – Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2014.v17i4.1029

Resumo

Objective: This in vitro study measured the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of a composite resin to sound and artificially eroded dentin, submitted to surface treatment with diamond bur (DB) or Er,Cr:YSGG laser (L). Material and Methods: Bovine dentin samples were randomly divided into six groups (n=11): G1-sound dentin, G2-eroded dentin, G3-eroded dentin treated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 1.5W, G4-eroded dentin treated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 2.0W, G5-eroded dentin treated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 2.5W and G6-eroded dentin treated with diamond bur. Erosive cycling was performed by immersion in 0.05M citric acid (pH2.3;10min; 6x/day) and in remineralizing solution (pH7.0, 1h, between acid attacks), for 5 days. Three composite resin cylinders were bonded to the samples and after 24h storage in distilled/deionized water (37oC), samples were submitted to microshear bond strength test and mean values (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (?=0.05). Results: G1 (19.9±7.6) presented the highest µSBS mean followed by G6 (12.2±3.8), which showed no statistically significant difference compared with the other groups, except from G4. The lowest µSBS value was found for G4 (7.1±1.5), which did not differ statistically from G2 (7.5±1.8), G3 (8.4±1.8) and G5 (8.6±3.2). Analysis of the fracture pattern revealed a higher incidence of adhesive fractures for all experimental groups. Conclusion: The results indicate that Er,Cr:YSGG laser at the parameters used in this in vitro study  did not enhance composite resin bonding to eroded dentin.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Downloads

Publicado

2014-11-03

Edição

Seção

Artigos de Pesquisa Clínica ou Laboratorial

Como Citar

1.
Ramos Oliveira TM, Ramos TM, Garbui BU, Hanashiro FS, de Freitas PM. Adhesion to eroded dentin submitted to different surface treatments. BDS [Internet]. 3º de novembro de 2014 [citado 28º de agosto de 2026];17(4):40-7. Disponível em: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1029

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)