Fiberglass versus cast metal posts: a practical review based on mechanical properties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2022.e3442Abstract
The current review aimed to compare the mechanical properties and clinical behavior of fiberglass and cast metal
posts. It included in-vitro studies, finite element analysis, clinical studies, and systematic reviews that evaluated
fiberglass and metal posts with reliable methodologies. The reports in the literature diverge on tooth failure modes
and stress distributions in the root according to different posts. Investigations suggest that fiberglass posts are
preferable because their elastic modulus is similar to dentin. Other studies mention that the flexibility of fiber posts
may damage the interface. The fracture load values of different studies could not be compared. The presence of a
ferrule seems beneficial. Cast metal posts provide higher characteristic strength to the set but with more unfavorable
failures. Intraradicular posts with a lower elastic modulus produce more stress between the cement layer and dentin.
In conclusion, fiberglass and cast metal posts can be used with a ferrule. Cast metal posts seem more appropriate
for weakened teeth. The presence of a ferrule benefits the system. Weakened teeth tolerate higher loads when
restored with cast metal posts, but when these posts fail, the only solution is tooth extraction. Clinical follow-ups
cannot yet detect differences between the survival rates of intraradicular fiberglass and cast metal posts.
KEYWORDS
Fiberglass; Post and core technique; Dental prosthesis; Mechanical tests; Finite element analysis.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Brazilian Dental Science uses the Creative Commons (CC-BY 4.0) license, thus preserving the integrity of articles in an open access environment. The journal allows the author to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
=================
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
(PDF)
For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).
The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.
This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.
