Influence of different types of light curing units and photoinitiators in microhardness and color of composite resins after immersion in wine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2019.v22i3.1754

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: the aim of this study to evaluate the microhardness and color change (?E) of composite resins, light cured with different LEDs, submitted to staining drink. Materials and Methods: Two composite resins with lucerin-TPO (Tetric N-Ceram/ Vit-l-escence) and camphorquinone (Filtek Z350) were select. Specimens (n=120) were prepared. Then were photopolymerized with LED of singlewave or polywave. Microhardness and color evaluations were performed before and after chalanges. Data were evaluated by two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test (p?0,05). Results: No statistically significant difference between the two generations of LEDs was found for microhardness data. Regarding the ?E, statistical difference between the two LEDs was observed for Tetric N- Ceram and Filtek Z350. Conclusion: Compostion of composites appears to have more influence on analyses than the type of LEDs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-30

How to Cite

1.
Souza MB de A, Briso ALF, Ramos F de S e S, de Oliveira Reis B, dos Santos PH, Fagundes TC. Influence of different types of light curing units and photoinitiators in microhardness and color of composite resins after immersion in wine. BDS [Internet]. 2019 Jul. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 21];22(3):371-7. Available from: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1754

Issue

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)