Estudo clínico comparativo entre reparo após sutura convencional e incisão à laser de dióxido de carbono (co2) com diferentes potências

Authors

  • Fernando Vagner Raldi
  • Walter Niccoli-Filho
  • Purnima Prakki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.1999.v2i1.32

Abstract

No presente estudo analisamos clinicamente as diferenças de respostas entre incisão à bisturi e à laser de CO2 na reparação tecidual, em pele de ratos. No grupo controle a incisão foi realizada com bisturi convencional seguida de sutura simples. Nos grupos tratados, a incisão foi realizada com laser CO2 variando-se as potências utilizadas (5, 10, 15 e 20W respectivamente). Os animais foram fotografados imediatamente após a cirurgia e com 3, 7, 14 e 21 dias. Notamos que nos grupos tratados com laser de CO2 houve ausência de sangramento, proporcionando melhor visualização do campo operatório e menor intensidade de inflamação e/ou edema pós operatório. Nas potências de 15 e 20W ocorreram áreas de carbonização ao longo das regiões incisadas, bastante evidentes, provocando um retardo na reparação, quando comparadas à incisão convencional. Já com as potências de 5 e 10W, a reparação teve um padrão similar ao do grupo controle.

Downloads

Published

2010-07-02

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (1999)

Section

Clinical or Laboratorial Research

License

COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AND RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
 (PDF)

For all articles published in the BDS journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit. All metadata associated with published articles is released under the Creative Commons CC0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Before the submission, authors must obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables, or any extract of a text) that does not fall into the public domain or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyright holder).

The authors hereby attest that the study is original and does not present manipulated data, fraud, or plagiarism. All names listed made a significant scientific contribution to the study, are aware of the presented data, and agree with the final version of the manuscript. They assume complete responsibility for the ethical aspects of the study.

This text must be printed and signed by all authors. The scanned version should be submitted as supplemental file during the submission process.